This is a legitimate question so I don't understand why it would get downvoted.
The Printing Press _already exists_ (https://github.com/mvanhorn/cli-printing-press) and it's not limited to SaaS providers like Aclif seems to be.
I downvoted it because I thought it was a bot response. Did not realize you were referring to cli-printing-press. The main difference is that printing press caches a local copy of data heavy sites like Discord channels, ESPN, etc. and creates a CLI for that API.
aclif produces a single CLI with a unified grammar for all APIs, plus support for canonical names (fed by external semantic data layers) and unified auth. It targets enterprise SaaS APIs.
I’ve found this to be true as well. It’s got really poor attention and will derail into world-building fast.
I’m convinced Google is just shipping it to capture market share but they know Gemini isn’t ready for serious use.
Gemini is the most sycophantic and world-builder of all LLMs I’ve used.
I’m sure all models do it but Gemini seems to have no guardrails and it will happily induce AI psychosis on you sooner or later.
Just no.
> I reported this issue privately through the project’s responsible-disclosure process. The underlying configuration has since been patched, so I’m publishing the details now to explain what the issue is and let users know to update their systems.
Nothing beats the feeling of having a proposed idea dismissed just to have the higher ups “come up” with it some time later. Don’t even dream about getting a footnote mention.
That’s the passive form of the experience, sure — and it often comes as a shock to people that this is a thing in human relations. If you set out to make it happen, and you don’t mind letting someone else execute on the idea, it can be quite fun to manipulate people into an epiphany you arranged for them. (See also teaching, coaching, et al. but with a flipped power differential.)
reply