Hot take, but as long as human dose not need to eat food half of the political problem will be solved.

Why is it a reductionism view? A true reductionist will no doubt claim taste won't left as well, at least not as a non-private langauge.

But this is basically reinventing the term "Aesthetics" which is a field that had several centuries of philosophy research about it. Not all of them will agree AI cannot have it.

Actually I think it is possible to reconcile Kant's third critique with the statement "LLM is possible to make aesthetic judgement" (with certain generous application of principle of charity, naturally).

AI does have something like Aesthetics and taste, but it's the average of all the inputs and so it's almost by definition the answer to 'what is the most average design possible based on all human prior data inputs?'

That's why AI prototypes of front end UIs tend to look the same without massaging them with your own design tokens, design language, and injecting your own taste.

read a book.

I use a mini amd pc with a disk bay. Surprisingly it is cheaper than many nas, and much more configurable (from memory to ssd) and have a much better gpu.

The only challenge would be finding a very good cable that stays solidly.

At this stage. No doubt calculus had plenty industrial benefit.

Cheating is only fully unethical under two radical assumption:

1. School is perfect. 2. With a diplomat from a perfect school, the society's employment process is perfect.

I don't think either the definition of perfect nor the way of achieving such perfection can ever be agreed upon.

There has been extensive criticism on meritocracy in recent years, such as The Tyranny of Merit by Michael J. Sandel.

Wake up, it is open. You can tailor it to your whatever kind of ideology. It is not like Anthropic which will force you to suck Dario's propaganda.

The only uniqueness of humanity is intelligence. If there is really AGI, human definitely is more close to it then other animals.

Every site should automatically get its own container.

This will break almost all sso when authentication service is at different domain.

uMatrix handles this by allowing you to add whitelists on a site by site basis.

Well, maybe because of the two ungrateful college students who dared to write in their essay the following notorious statement:

> We expect that advertising funded search engines will be inherently biased towards the advertisers and away from the needs of the consumers.

I highly recommend you to blame these two guys for their lack of recognition of how great Google is, here is their name: Sergey Brin and Lawrence Page.

You do realize

> having mostly succeeded at giving the poorest people one Earth an equal product to the richest people on Earth

is equivalent in this scenario of saying:

> having mostly succeeded at exploiting the poorest people one Earth an equal amount to the richest people on Earth.

While the poorest people have less already, right?