how are we supposed to answer that? we don't know anything about you lol. you gotta give me more info, like, results for what? when you're coding? what are you working on? is it driven by yourself or is it for your job? help me help you.

as soon as i saw "silently" i knew who actually wrote this

My GPT detector isn't as finely tuned, but I did notice the emdashes

AFLAC!?

just curious, how much do these actually discover useful practices or pitfalls, on top of just being for fun?

The repo page says exactly why these long running instructions were researched.

A very long-running instruction can be used to break SMI: https://github.com/xoreaxeaxeax/smiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

little bit unrelated, but I watched the IG video and I thought the visual design of the app was cool af! what inspired the style?

maybe instead of worrying that people on the internet will be good at coding, we could start writing memory safe apis. almost all cves are fixed by using rust

I don't get this post. It says software is getting worse, and then... gives a handful of anecdotal evidence. That could have been done at any point in the life of the software industry, including in the pre-agentic era. So the assertion behind the post doesn't really have any weight to it. Is there any actual, respectable evidence that software is actually getting worse? Also, what would worse even mean really? More buggy? Less reliable? Less creative, flexible?

is it better than a Brother printer, cause i've had one for like a decade and it's the shit