It is not. Vocabulary is far from the binary of "you know this word or you don't". At a minimum, it is usually split into passive and active vocabulary, with passive being the words you understand when encountered, and active being the words you can use effectively. Wikipedia's entry is a pretty good overview.
It is more like an ability to recognize the word when it is used in context.
I got ~1/3 that is very generous estimate even for "recall" case (recognize), and it obviously false for the "generate" case (using in speech) where I guess my vocabulary is likely ~1/90 of all English words.
I think that picking the correct (or most correct, which is trickier) use of the word in context (out of, as you say, many options) might be a good way to test for receptive vocabulary.
Feels very human, in the most positive way. It's a delight to see such a beautifully crafted and polished UI design, especially when every other website and web app is created with Claude.
This article reads like a covert ad for Upwork, a platform for hiring freelancers.
> C-suite executives, bringing in freelance talent into their workforce say freelancers are meeting productivity demands and often exceeding them, outpacing full-time employees.
> a fundamental shift in how we organize talent and work
> leveraging alternative talent pools
= "You should hire freelancers instead of full-time employees."
> outdated work models
I guess they try to project the idea that full-time employment is outdated.