I'm not. I just don't want to implement code for reading files, setting up and population databases, logs, etc. manually anymore. I want to automate boilerplate, the occasional frontend code, etc. and focus on the parts that are interesting for me. This way I can get things done that I wouldn't otherwise.
I'm very certain you have used lots of software, either directly or indirectly, that has ai parts in it. The truth is, that it's quite reliable if done correctly. As if 'human written' software is somehow flawless.
But you'll use the mediocre software written by hundreds of mediocre devs, and a team that doesn't fully understand the whole codebase due it's ever-inflated technical debt?
I get the angst of AI coding, but it is funny that people think hand written code at scale is somehow not susceptible to all of the problems of code gen. A lot of it isn't artful - it's factory generated slop.
Also, I'm checking all generated code, have tests, and have developed a concept that increases code correctness reliably. It works - as good or bad that fact might be.
No I don’t know how he gets that info. Most contributions to the language these days are AI assisted, but that’s a completely different matter.
IMO if you can afford AI assistance, it would be irresponsible to not use it, given how good AIs are st bug finding and code review
Then make a better chair yourself. Also, I don't see how chair2 needs r&d and incurs hardware costs.
reply