Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | hun3's commentslogin

I believe r2 can already highlight same 16-bit patterns, am I missing anything?

Browsers (WHATWG) uses UTS #46, not IDNA2008.

ada-url (https://github.com/ada-url/ada-python) closely tracks WHATWG spec and thus less likely to lead to parser differential vulnerabilities when interoperating with browsers.


> The only downside is that it won't stop UDP packets from getting to a UDP listener. There will not be a response but the application will still see it.

Try:

  ip route add src ${net} blackhole


System WebView but Electron is now the system


Ah, that's a new systemd module now.


The operating system has historically trusted the applications not to do dumb things too much.

Only now we're witnessing the consequences much more frequently thanks to accelerated slop.


> The operating system has historically trusted the applications not to do dumb things too much.

The OS is a thin layer providing an abstract and consistent interface regardless of the hardware configuration. Policing applications is mostly related to security and resources utilization, not moronic errors.


> The OS is a thin layer providing an abstract and consistent interface regardless of the hardware configuration.

This is called a hardware abstraction layer, not OS.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardware_abstraction


(zenzi)³

I mean zenzi-cubic


Or cubizenzic?


China has proxies that sell cheaper access to frontier models in exchange for permission to train on your data.


Right.

As an example: Oracle and PostgreSQL don't have dirty reads: READ UNCOMMITTED does nothing. MySQL's concurrency model depends on the engine.


What keeps users themselves from vibe-coding their own software?

If you don't own quality, why should I pay? You're just a middleman at that point.


If you squint hard enough, you'll notice your bank account serves as an IPC semaphore replenishing API credit balances.

Your wallet is now a real-time communication channel.


There was the commercial of a bank using mobile banking as a chat system by sending 1ct back and forth and using the description.


I recall some friends did that in colleage. Obviously with a bit of teenage humor in money transfer descriptions... which is not really funny, since there is no way to remove the transaction ever. Good times.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: