Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | kaonwarb's commentslogin

Making one small corner of the world a little bit better is a good thing. There's not much use in complaining that it's not as big of an impact as could hypothetically be achieved on some larger issues.


“He who would do good to another must do it in minute particulars. General good is the plea of the scoundrel, hypocrite, and flatterer.” -- William Blake


It's things like this that rob my of my hope for the world.


Lol. Someone liking this change is stupid for letting it lift their outlook, right? How stupid is it then to let this comment rob your hope.


:) Alternative reply to lighten mood in odd thread:

  Not to be Debbie Downer but making one small corner of the world a little bit better has no effect on what matters to billions of people.

  We are facing very real global and societal issues that people are actively exacerbating.

  If a dude explaining that there’s not much use in complaining robs you of hope for the world, then please broaden your perspective.


You understand I'm on your side here, right?


Sorry yes, giving silly alt reply


R.e. customers: Atlas accounts for a quarter of Delaware incorporations (https://x.com/jeff_weinstein/status/2023891497792532950?s=20). But yes, Clerky does have additional capabilities, as others point in.


My comment was poorly worded, what I meant was they have both lifetime and recurring customers. Their team is insanely good, specially their email support.

Seems like the easiest way to grow Atlas.


iRobot is now 100% owned by Shenzhen Picea Robotics of China. (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1159167/000115916726...)


Yes, that's a very good company to be the owner of iRobot, because they are just a robot factory and not a near-monopoly e-commerce retailer.

They are essentially on equal footing with other robotic vacuum manufacturers. iRobot didn't go out of business or get absorbed into a larger company lowering competition in the marketplace.

It's also not the FTC's job to ensure that companies, especially ones with zero/trivial national security or domestic labor force value, remain under domestic ownership. Amazon itself is not really a "domestic" company, it's publicly traded. Anyone from any non-sanctioned country can buy shares of Amazon.


How would you define a domestic company?


> zero/trivial national security

Huh?

Robots with vision + sounds sensors and connected to the internet in professional homes across your country are definitely a security issue.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-10-05/robot-vacuum-deebot-e...

One of the leaked images taken by Roomba robot vacuums shows a lady sitting on her toilet - personal.


Does that have military value? I think it's more of a personal security issue.


This wouldn't exist without OP's agency; it's reasonable for them to take credit.

If there are bugs, etc., that's fair game. Declaring hate for folks because of their approach is not.


No, not really. If you used an LLM you didn't actually make anything. It's like if one commissions a work of art: yes, it wouldn't exist if not for your actions, but no, you didn't make it.


> If you used an LLM you didn't actually make anything

On my way to ask all academia and researchers to stop using LLMs for their research. As it's just llm doing the research, right?


Academia would largely agree


Criticism with no justification behind it is cheap.


irony


- Desired thing doesn't exist. - Author acts, using extremely helpful tools. - Desired thing now does exist.

Is that not enough?


Not quite, but sendcutsend.com is good.


Raise wages, and hence costs, relative to non-union locations (a direct purpose of unions!); implement restrictive work rules; lead occasional strikes.


What makes you think separate nations would effectively cooperate in this way?


Might as well try, no? Or do you think it's better we just risk it? I mean it's not like the West has any hard or soft power to encourage cooperation.


Not in winter, for geographies that have serious winters.


still need to feed the livestock multiple times a day, chop wood, fix stuff around the house


I think the difference is they're completable jobs. You work until it's done. At least for the day.


You aren't chopping wood everyday. Hopefully that's been prepared.

Feeding yes.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: