Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | nova22033's commentslogin

You don't think Google has a self-interest in this? Google up how many shares of spacex are held by Alphabet.

Alphabet holds approximately 551 million shares of SpaceX (trading under the ticker SPCX), valued at roughly $94.1 billion, which represents about a 4% to 6% stake in the company.

It's a little crazy they haven't tried to sell it off yet. Maybe they don't want to trigger a bank rush or they're limited in their ability to do so?

why would they sell? because of ridiculously large the valuation is? like, I guess at SpaceX's valuation there's tremendous downside and little upside (x2 growth is unlikely when it's a third of the tech sector)

I could also see some key decision-makers just being nerds that like space.

I don’t see how America or Google remain relevant unless SpaceX succeeds .

This. China's copying SpaceX's homework and the public/private system towards that is operating so efficiently, if SpaceX lets off the gas, US is going to fall behind off the next long term gold rushes like asteroid mining, and said space datacenters.

Huh?

They invested $900 million[1] in 2015, and it is worth $94.1 billion today. Why sell? They also likely have restrictions on selling post-IPO, but I don't think you can trigger a "bank run" on a stock anyway; the price will just keep adjusting as you sell/buy until it gets absurd.

A bank run happens when everyone tries to withdraw all their money at the same time and the bank runs out of cash. Not really possible in the stock market where companies literally can create/destroy shares and there is a whole secondary pricing layer to it.

1. https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/alphabets-spacex-be...


"A bank run happens when everyone tries to withdraw all their money at the same time and the bank runs out of cash. Not really possible in the stock market where companies literally can create/destroy shares and there is a whole secondary pricing layer to it." Sure, it's not possible for stocks to become insolvent in the same way, but if a large shareholder sells it could trigger a panic and greatly decrease the price.

>They invested $900 million[1] in 2015, and it is worth $94.1 billion today. Why sell?

Didnt you answer your own question? Most would consider a 100x ROI more than sufficient for taking profits


$94.1B will barely buy you some RAM.

FBI really screwed the pooch

Which explains their recent rule change re: beastiality...

Oracle is going to bear the brunt of this. If OpenAI can't make a LOT of money, how are they going to pay Oracle?

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/oracle-made-a-300-billion-bet...


Is it anti-Musk to point out Musk makes wild promises that rarely come true...robotaxis at scale, xAI creating MacroHard etc etc.


Don't forget MacroHard


Were these engineers fired and replaced with AI? Article implies they brought back retired engineers.


How many people use grok professionally? Compared to claude code/codex?


Chinese and Russian intel agencies can set up American shell corporations and buy all of our personal data....but using a model to secure my customer? Well...no...you can't have that.


This is a gift to Anthropic. Our model is so good the US government banned it...Oh, and we're doing an IPO soon.


And the US gov could pull the rug out from under our business at any time? That's confidence inspiring?


How is this good for their long term revenue?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: