Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It must be really rewarding to be the author of an open-source project when you read feedback like this...

Backbone is "dying", if you will, because an awful lot has changed in the last five years, not because it was necessarily fundamentally bad - though, of course, it had its limitations.



Should we all hold our tongues lest any notional FOSS author be offended?

Too many chefs throw their hat into the ring as it is (especially in JS framework land), a higher bar isn't necessarily bad.


Well, I think: 1) "notional" is an odd choice of word since @jashkenas has over 20K karma on here; and 2) it's fine to offer reasoned criticism, but the sort of denigration I was responding to ("messes", "useless", odd comments about Rubyists) really is unnecessary.


1) I'm not sure what you mean, your comment was generalised, implying it has a wider scope than this one author. I'm also not sure what karma has to do with anything..

2) If the rubyist comment is 'odd' to you, how are you sure that it's denigrating? as for 'messes' and 'useless', you've divorced them from context:

> Backbone led to messes bigger than jQuery messes, it's full of useless stuff

> What's the point of backbone model? it's useless so one has to use relational.

Your concern is tone-policing?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: