Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Seriously, how can that post get -3 karma; why the hate, I have a lot more sympathy for Mr Clueless without backups than this.

The user in question committed his data, his 'life' as he calls it, to a service that is made for mom+pop, without reading the EULA, and he complains?

The guy's a composer and keeps his masters into.... iTunes? Seriously?

He discovers /after the fact/ that his special recording he care so much about has been replaced? Hasn't he tried google, or perhaps do a bit of due diligence about it before committing 120GB of his precious data to a cloud provider?

... To a service that is /meant/ to be able to replace songs automatically? What's not clear about 'automatic'?

Now I don't mean apple is /right/ here, it's very likely done so that apple can sell machines with less flash, for more -or something like that- there's no doubt that there is a reason why they delete the data.. a reason that doesn't need to benefits the user ultimately.

However I don't have a lot of sympathy for that particular user; he comes as someone who should know better.

I'm a mac user since 1984, and I don't use Apple Music, iCloud, or any of these fancy subscription services. I'm also a musician, and a photographer, and it wouldn't cross my mind for a minute to just commit my stuff to a place that might decide the data is 'theirs' in their next update.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: