Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You might be right. My point is that the deterrence excuse is difficult to prove to the point of absurdity.


Your absurd example doesn't really engage the point in a meaningful, substantive manner. It merely mocks the idea that deterrence is real. It frames it as something crazy people imagine. It isn't remotely a good faith argument.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: