Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I found that Kite is comparable with Tabnine, at least with Python.

https://kite.com/integrations/kite-vs-tabnine/



Because this says “single token completion” as the tabnine example gif I’m guessing it isn’t comparing to deep tabnine at all, which is on an entirely different level


Is Kite's behavior still as shady as it used to be?


the memory usage comparison is accurate for tabnine, at least in my case. local-only tab nine wasn't practical. and using a cloud server for an autocomplete seems unnecessary.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: