Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Plenty validation can be found in whole communities - anything concerning Ruby for example lives and breathes test or behavior driven development.

Btw, Peter Norvig himself has good things to say on TDD[1]. So using him in an argument against TDD whilst he's using tests is kinda self defeating.

1. http://gigamonkeys.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/coders-unit-test...



Yep, and witness Rake releasing an update that breaks Rails, Rubygems releasing an update that breaks Rails, Rails 3 being a performance nightmare, gem authors nuking each others' namespaces...

I think in general that Ruby has one of the better communities out there (I'm a rubyist myself) but all this noise about TDD and cute DSLs (RSpec, Cucumber...) hasn't made a material difference in Ruby code quality compared to any other language.


I'm not saying TDD is good or bad per se. I'm merely saying it's not a good approach for exploring a problem domain.

(Tho' I do think Ron Jeffries is a snake-oil peddler).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: