Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

According to Wikipedia, Mark Cuban has $2.5 billion.

If he thinks the patents are bogus (which I totally believe), why not fight a high profile, precedent setting case?

If he thinks the law is broken, why not lobby for patent reform? Or a loser-pays system?



Sam Wyly did something similar, set $100,000 per annum for a law firm to slowly destroy Ma Bell. http://www.charlesandsamwyly.com/sam-wyly-highway-computers.... More about it in his book (which is outstanding for any business read). http://www.1000dollarsandanidea.com/


I'm pretty sure that the number of patents you could get revoked with $2.5 billion in legal effort is much smaller than the total number of potentially problematic patents. Unfortunatly fighting bad patents is a classic public good [1] which means its hard to coordinate people on making them.

If your feeling altruistic, however, the EFF is working to help get some particularly egregious examples revoked. [2] I've donated to them and I encourage others to do the same.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_good

[2] https://w2.eff.org/patent/


Do you know he's not doing those?


I have no idea about the lobbying, but the article seems to suggest that he is just paying increasing insurance and settlement costs instead.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: