Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The bit he was actually focusing on seemed to me to be that they started using his name to sell the books.

If _the artist_ is the product being sold, don't you think the right thing to do would have been to work out a new agreement?

I thought it was incredibly well written and quite forgiving of him.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: