Before you solicit more PR for Browseology I would tighten the story focusing on the homepage. You have a pleasant, simple aesthetic but IMHO the homepage contains too many words and options. The result is an unnecessarily confusing first impression. My notes: http://idea.s3.amazonaws.com/browseology.png

You might want to gear Browseology more toward women. Women love shopping and they're more social about it than men. I can imagine your app serving their sensibilities better with a little wordsmithing. This might make PR easier for you because it would focus your messaging on benefits rather than features.

And, you went through the trouble of mocking something up and sharing it with us. We'll definitely take a close look at your ideas. Thanks.

I find that videos are becoming a popular way to tell that story - if you choose to go that route, keep it under ~ 3 mins.

1) Get rid of all that text. Make the search box huge and pre-fill it with something useful. Don't put a bunch of words underneath explaining what the user should fill it with.

2) ~30sec video in _female_ voice of buying something together. Make sure the first ("preview") frame is a picture that shows why your product is awesome.

3) Colors(!) on the front page. Looks like it was designed by a tasteful developer, rather than a tasteful designer (if I'm wrong, then tell the designer to get a bit crazier).

4) No elephants. Seriously. Nobody wants to be an elephant. Even 'gear nerd' men don't want to be elephants. Unless .. you're selling elephants?

5) Integrate with FB/Twitter/Whatever. Put the logos on your _homepage_ so that everybody knows you're 140ch-compatible. This will increase the buzz factor.

6) If your site does badass technical stuff, write some technical blogs about them and get them out to the relevant humangregators. Opinion-makers troll technical posts to find the newest cool stuff.

Thank you for that, and your suggestions.

I assume this was sort of a typo, but YC doesn't have any particular influence on PR firms. I think you mean influence on the press.

To understand how to do without connections, it's probably helpful to understand what value connections have. The point of connections is authentication. If I recommend a startup to a reporter or an investor, they know I have to tell the truth, because if I start to be a source of bum leads they'll stop listening to me.

The value of authentication is that it makes judging you easier. If you come highly recommended, a reporter or investor will at least talk to you. (The joke is that the YC name can get you rejected by any VC in the valley.) If you don't, they have to judge you for themselves, and that's hard, because they get tons of inbound requests and don't usually have technical backgrounds.

There are two possible solutions: (1) get authentication by some other means than personal recommendations, and (2) get publicity through venues that don't require so much authentication.

The best strategy for (1) is to get lots of users. If your traffic graph (or better still, revenue graph) is going up sharply, reporters and investors will pay attention to you. In effect, users are recommending you.

You may say: how can we get lots of users without publicity? The same way Facebook did: make something so good that users tell one another about it. When you have exponential growth, you can start with a very small seed-- just your friends and friends' friends-- and you'll still win.

A good example of (2) is to talk about your startup on venues like HN, where many readers understand technology well and are capable of judging whether something is good or not without any external seal of approval. Being on HN is not the same kind of traffic boost as TechCrunch, obviously, but it's a start. Literally, sometimes: sometimes TC gets leads here.

Your points on authentication is very interesting. It seems that the press definitely cares about names.

Our feedback from Hackernews is good, but in terms of getting people psyched about it, not so much, I think it's mainly because the target audience is not exactly the best one. The feedback we ARE getting is awesome, technical feedback, and experience driven feedback... but we haven't touched on the users who actually want to USE it. We will probably attack the other communities that are 1) people who love to shop, 2) people who do a ton of research on products. That probably also includes a ton of women in that as well.

Can't forget to build a good app either, so those improvements will come as well. It's hard to know what direction to go in and what to focus on without ample feedback. We have plenty of ideas of what could work, speculation, but validation of these ideas, or even new ideas is what we're fishing for now.

Women love shopping together (frequently without any impulse to buy) because they learn about their friends by seeing what they are interested in. So I think your business model is much more interesting to women shopping for clothes than men shopping for digital cameras. If you buy into this idea, then your target market is female friends separated by geography, not men who would be equally happy working at Best Buy.

Now, your 'big elephant leading little elephant' logo reinforces your site title 'browseology', which is presumably the study of how to successfully browse Amazon for shopping purposes. For men, you're putting them in an inferior position, implying they have less knowledge and bruising tender egos by suggesting they lack browseology skills. For women, you're suggesting that they are elephant friends. Women like elephants, but they don't want to identify with them.

The idea and the technology both have merit. But the social contract you present to potential customers is a double fail. So: rebrand. You could do worse than grab a few co-workers, load up on weed and beer, and lock yourselves in a room for the weekend with a TV that tunes only to Bravo and TLC, to immerse yourselves in gender stereotypes.

Haha @ "Women like elephants, but they don't want to identify with them."

Contact relevant and/or popular blogs/news outlets with non-form emails as to how and why they should write about your site. Getting on Lifehacker was a huge boost for one of my side projects.

If you can afford it buy the keywords on google, yahoo, msn that are extremely relevant.

Post to various web application directories(this was probably the least effective use of time)

By the way, as with all kinds of approaches like this: Do NOT abuse the relationship. Be kind, thankful, and don't pressure/harrass them.

YC espouses building something people want. To get coverage, you need to build something people want to talk about. You can substitute connections, bulldog PR folks, or hurl money at the problem, but IMO you should never attempt PR until you're pretty sure you have something to talk about that makes a reporter say, "Holy crap-- that'll make a good story".

The common response is that it's really hard to be worth talking about with a boring product, right? Because no one wants to talk about shoe companies (except Zappos) or project management software (except 37Signals), right? If your product isn't inherently interesting, you need to craft a different story. About customer service mania or simplicity. Or how the idea came to you. Or how your founders are living cheap to avoid funding (TicketStumbler has done a killer job here).

Seriously, read "Made to Stick", or at very least read the summary. http://www.madetostick.com/excerpts/

How about 'ShopSync' or something like that (that particular domain is not available for new registration it appears, but it IS for sale.) There are many variations on that domain concept, using synonyms and such, and many of them seem to be for sale by the same domain owner...perhaps that person tried a similar site and failed [or, more likely, never got started.] He/She may be open to joint ventures or other creative arrangements if you don't have the cash to buy an existing domain. I'm sure there are also other good domains that you could find for just the registration fee. Browseology would be a good name for your parent/holding company, once you're raking in the dough from this and move on to your next project ;-)

I also wrote more about getting press for blogs/companies here: http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/blog/getting-traffic-fo...

Btw, I now write for Lifehacker occasionally, so if you ever have interesting startups, send me an email.

http://blog.mixergy.com/tim-ferriss/

Sponsor events or workshops relevant to your industry

Give something away for free (we created a free WordPress theme and are releasing some open source projects)

Give your product away for free to influential/VIP customers. This helps a lot if you get the right people. Developing a couple relationships like this can really help you early on.

Submit your app/site to magazines for review.

Check out HARO. I made some connections there ... to early to tell if its valuable though http://www.helpareporter.com/

You should be hitting the websites which would want to use this service, deal sites, shopping forums, price comparing forums, etc. Attack the forums/discussion areas in those sites, which are very large. If the shoppers from those sites aren't interested in your service, then you may have a problem with execution/the idea behind your website.

Again, HN/tech crunch/digg/reddit is the wrong audience for your idea.

We're not looking to convert on this audience (HN/techcrunch/digg/reddit etc) - we just launched and we think feedback like this from really smart people is super useful. We're still gathering information before we feel like we can present an easy-to-use package for consumers.

It's harder on price comparison forums to ask our customers what they want and get a conversation started when they're looking to discuss the best deals on digital cameras. We tell them about the product, and hope they try it out. If they don't reach out to submit feedback, it doesn't help us as much in improving.

For our successes, sometimes you luck out:

* We created bug.gd and the day we uploaded the logo to a random "Web 2.0" site, one of the moderators posted it on Digg, made the front page, and from there it scattered throughout the world.

* We mentioned bug.gd to TC a couple of weeks later (since the Digg storm imploded our site) and it was picked up by TC, Mashable, Lifehacker, etc.

* As people ran into us and heard about us, they spread the word around, and now it grows on its own, getting covered in PC World, and even local news coverage in random cities: http://blog.bug.gd/2008/11/08/buggd-coverage-on-wivb-buffalo...

* At Pycon last year, we did a lot of spreading the word by mouth and lightning talk. As an experiment, we released error_help() from the Python interpreter so that you could get help for your most recent exception from the rest of the world who may have run into it. Very few people used it, but we got a lot of interest from people who heard more than a few words about it all.

* For yumbunny.com (a dating site experiment) we mentioned it to TC the week before Valentine's day and they covered it. We issued press releases about it, though, and no one cared one bit.

* For tinyarro.ws, it spread through Twitter like wildfire because it was so odd (and shorteners are inherently viral) and it ended up with coverage on Mashable, Lifehacker, and zillions of blogs.

The only advice I can give is to make something either: (a) Useful enough that people want to talk about it, (b) Interesting/quirky enough that people want to talk about , or (c) be lucky sometimes (i.e. keep rolling the dice and trying until the die roll hits).

My best advice to you is:

* Try new APIs or new fads to get attention for yourself

* Seek partnerships that are mutually beneficial for popular sites

* Send not-too-uptight emails about your service to people you want to cover you. Try not to do form letters.

* Advertise on niche blogs or sites. While they may not give preferential treatment to advertisers, they will have heard of you so you don't end up in the spam folder automatically and you get their ear enough to say a few words.

Getting new APIs or new fads is good, but they have to be fitting. Getting buried in all of the trends going on might be harder than standing out in the crowd as something totally different. But then nobody will find you with searches and other trend word searches. I'll definitely keep looking into hooking into trends when/if it makes sense.

Mass e-mailing journalists and issuing formal press releases is obsolete, that's for sure.

You need to build a relationship with a few key influencers. The problem is that they tend to behave like deaf people and typically won't answer your e-mails. And being obnoxious is not the way to go past that hurdle.

So it takes months of being smart, showing smart, getting to know other people like you, or slightly ahead of you, maybe piggy-backing from other events, etc. If you persevere, eventually you'll get the connections and the coverage.

It's not obvious from an immediate glance at your site exactly what it is and why it's special. I have to read lots of text. Journos love pictures.

By as frictionless as possible--make it so they can click a link and immediately without doing anything--see what your product does.

I also found having a media kit is useful and point them to it. In the media kit try to have a short/non-markety summary of your service, logos/graphics for their use, relevant links, the bios of your team, and direct contact information.

To me, you fall in the slightly hard to understand category. I grok pair shopping but because you're innovating with a new thing, I'm confused and don't know what experience to expect. This leaves me confused.

If I was working with you, here is what I would do:

Take two laptops and $100. Go down to the local starbucks. Find pairs of people sitting at tables.

Ask them to try your site, in exchange you buy them each a drink. Or if you want to get really fancy... do a Microsoft--you find it, you keep it thing and let them spend like $20. (If you do this, I'd record them and get their permission to use it--could be good fodder for your site)

This experience will give you an idea of how people are responding to what you're doing.

Product ended up failing, but I made enough connections along the way that I landed on my feet.

By the by. If you're counting on PR as your primary distribution strategy, you've already failed.

Honestly, have some respect for your own product. Don't try to piggy-back on others' popularity. And try to look at things objectively. I understand that you may be excited of your app's real-time features, but just because something else does real-time updating doesn't mean they're the same thing.

Honestly, you're not Google, so don't try to make it look like what your project is as big as theirs'. You don't need to do that for people to be interested in your site. Just advertise it as what it is, a real-time way to shop with someone else online.

It's actually more similar than might appear at first glance. Google Wave is real time, and when someone types/edits the wave you're looking at, you see that. On Browseology, when someone types in a search or any other text, you see that. When you change pages, so does everyone else. It's this real time updating that lets everyone browsing together see the same thing.

We're really excited about Browseology, it's true. Of course I have a lot of respect for what we've built from scratch. We tried to let people know about it while Google Wave was getting a lot of attention. This wasn't the right place to do that.

And you're right - we're not Google. Does that mean we can't build something that would be useful for you? We wanted to let everyone know that they could try this out now (instead of waiting months for the public release of Wave) to see what this aspect of real time collaboration looks like.

You can always do something profound and useful. Just make sure you don't get carried away with your own excitement. Browseology and Wave share real-time features, but that doesn't really mean they're the same "idea".

Remember that the wave idea and online shopping are completely separate things. I think your mistake was in not realizing this. Real-time editing, which is the similarity you mentioned, has already been implemented in apps like Google Docs and Etherpad.

And you're right, it's not a good idea to try to get attention by taking the spotlight from someone else (although it could be said that Google's partial Wave release was a response to Microsoft's Bing announcement).

One thing you could do right now is write an analysis of the technical aspects of what you did, comparing yourself to Wave and other real-time apps. Make sure you talk about both the similarities and the differences, especially what makes your app different.

I don't see a differentiator, just a bad attitude.

A CNet reporter quoted me for a front page Google Wave story and linked our site. Instant traffic spike.