Patched, but still vulnerable... how come? | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

pygy_ on April 10, 2014 | parent | context | favorite | on: Testing for "reverse" Heartbleed

Patched, but still vulnerable... how come?

0x0 on April 10, 2014 | [–]

They probably patched their public-facing web servers, but not their internal link-fetching app servers.

borisjabes on April 10, 2014 | [–]

Their public-facing servers (that receive requests) were patched but not the code that made outbound HTTP requests.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact