I haven't digested it completely yet, but I suspect that the definition of `next... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

VMG on July 9, 2014 | parent | context | favorite | on: The New Haskell Homepage

I haven't digested it completely yet, but I suspect that the definition of `next` in `allRationals` is incorrect

     next (a, b, c)   = (a, f b, f c)

I can't find the declaration for `f` (probably go?)

tel on July 9, 2014 [–]

It is, sorry. I was writing that all without checking it and I can't edit now.

I wrote a post elaborating the ideas here: http://tel.github.io/2014/07/09/calkin_wilf_for_early-ish_ha...

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact