> I don't think Go's splash was as big as node's, but it's found its way in to more organizations than not.
I'm having trouble understanding the second half of this statement. The two most clear readings are that over 50% of organizations use Go, or that over 50% of the organizations that have used Node now use Go (while still possibly also using Node). I doubt you intended either of these meanings. How am I misreading you?
EDIT: do you perhaps mean that over 50% of the organizations that use Node and have experimented with Go have decided to move forward with more Go projects?
I think the statement themartorana is probably contextually inaccurate.
That being said, there are plenty of stories coming out about how companies are evaluating Go and seeing performance increases in mission critical application; as opposed to stories of people ripping out pieces of Go and replacing it with something more optimal for their situation.
Yup, those should have been two separate statements:
1. Node made a bigger initial splash than go
2. A large number of organizations that deal with high-volume, highly-concurrent data sets and API traffic are either in production with Go, or are experimenting with it. (All the companies I mentioned have Go in production)
I'm having trouble understanding the second half of this statement. The two most clear readings are that over 50% of organizations use Go, or that over 50% of the organizations that have used Node now use Go (while still possibly also using Node). I doubt you intended either of these meanings. How am I misreading you?
EDIT: do you perhaps mean that over 50% of the organizations that use Node and have experimented with Go have decided to move forward with more Go projects?